We try to go with “tech”…

Which is too broad, and so we try to narrow down the scope… by, say, “software and cloud” guidelines…

Though that doesn’t altogether work, does it, so maybe go with “FANG” or, for good measure, “FANG+” (which, I guess, goes to eleven?)…

Or perhaps reverse the process and define it all based on performance, say, call it “growth,” which is distinct from “value” (but how exactly, in this case?)…

Or maybe if we show in contrast to some others, because “tech” is different from “communication” and “financials”… right? (Take, for instance, Square…)

And it is through distinctions such as these that regulations are proposed and studied…

Because the label, in some cases, is its own definition.